[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13838519#comment-13838519
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HADOOP-9640:
-------------------------------------

Sorry, it looks like I read the wrong document. I'm glad you still found some 
of my comments useful, but I'll read the updated one too and get back to you :)

> RPC Congestion Control with FairCallQueue
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-9640
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9640
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Xiaobo Peng
>              Labels: hdfs, qos, rpc
>         Attachments: NN-denial-of-service-updated-plan.pdf, 
> faircallqueue.patch, rpc-congestion-control-draft-plan.pdf
>
>
> Several production Hadoop cluster incidents occurred where the Namenode was 
> overloaded and failed to respond. 
> We can improve quality of service for users during namenode peak loads by 
> replacing the FIFO call queue with a [Fair Call 
> Queue|https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12616864/NN-denial-of-service-updated-plan.pdf].
>  (this plan supersedes rpc-congestion-control-draft-plan).
> Excerpted from the communication of one incident, “The map task of a user was 
> creating huge number of small files in the user directory. Due to the heavy 
> load on NN, the JT also was unable to communicate with NN...The cluster 
> became responsive only once the job was killed.”
> Excerpted from the communication of another incident, “Namenode was 
> overloaded by GetBlockLocation requests (Correction: should be getFileInfo 
> requests. the job had a bug that called getFileInfo for a nonexistent file in 
> an endless loop). All other requests to namenode were also affected by this 
> and hence all jobs slowed down. Cluster almost came to a grinding 
> halt…Eventually killed jobtracker to kill all jobs that are running.”
> Excerpted from HDFS-945, “We've seen defective applications cause havoc on 
> the NameNode, for e.g. by doing 100k+ 'listStatus' on very large directories 
> (60k files) etc.”



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to