[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Chris Nauroth updated HADOOP-10211:
-----------------------------------

    Release Note: The hadoop.rpc.protection configuration property previously 
supported specifying a single value: one of authentication, integrity or 
privacy.  An unrecognized value was silently assumed to mean authentication.  
This configuration property now accepts a comma-separated list of any of the 3 
values, and urecognized values are rejected with an error.  Existing 
configurations containing an invalid value must be corrected.

I'm adding a release note to indicate the potential impact on existing 
deployments that are misconfigured.

> Enable RPC protocol to negotiate SASL-QOP values between clients and servers
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-10211
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10211
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: security
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Benoy Antony
>            Assignee: Benoy Antony
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.4.0
>
>         Attachments: HADOOP-10211.patch, HADOOP-10211.patch, 
> HADOOP-10211.patch, HADOOP-10211.patch, HADOOP-10211.patch, 
> HADOOP-10221.sample
>
>
> SASL allows different types of protection are referred to as the quality of 
> protection (qop). It is negotiated between the client and server during the 
> authentication phase of the SASL exchange. Currently hadoop allows specifying 
> a single QOP value  via _hadoop.rpc.protection_. 
> The enhancement enables a user to specify multiple QOP values -  
> _authentication_, _integrity_, _privacy_ as a comma separated list via 
> _hadoop.rpc.protection_
> The client and server can have different set of values for  
> _hadoop.rpc.protection_ and they will negotiate to determine the QOP to be 
> used for communication.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to