[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13975281#comment-13975281
 ] 

Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-9361:
----------------------------------------

linking as a dependent on HDFS-4258 -handling of rename during operations on 
open files -including append-

Without this, a test of HDFS append+ rename fails:
{code}
-------------------------------------------------------
 T E S T S
-------------------------------------------------------
Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.contract.hdfs.TestHDFSAppendContract
Tests run: 5, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.481 sec <<< 
FAILURE! - in org.apache.hadoop.fs.contract.hdfs.TestHDFSAppendContract
testRenameFileBeingAppended(org.apache.hadoop.fs.contract.hdfs.TestHDFSAppendContract)
  Time elapsed: 0.044 sec  <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: renamed destination file does not exist: not found 
hdfs://localhost:54005/test/test/renamed in hdfs://localhost:54005/test/test
        at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.fs.contract.ContractTestUtils.assertPathExists(ContractTestUtils.java:587)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.fs.contract.AbstractFSContractTestBase.assertPathExists(AbstractFSContractTestBase.java:254)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.fs.contract.AbstractAppendContractTest.testRenameFileBeingAppended(AbstractAppendContractTest.java:127)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
        at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:45)
        at 
org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
        at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:42)
        at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
        at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
        at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:30)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
        at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68)
        at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:47)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
        at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
        at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:30)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:264)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:124)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:200)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:153)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103)

{code}

> Strictly define the expected behavior of filesystem APIs and write tests to 
> verify compliance
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-9361
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9361
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: fs, test
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 2.2.0, 2.4.0
>            Reporter: Steve Loughran
>            Assignee: Steve Loughran
>         Attachments: HADOOP-9361-001.patch, HADOOP-9361-002.patch, 
> HADOOP-9361-003.patch, HADOOP-9361-004.patch, HADOOP-9361-005.patch, 
> HADOOP-9361-006.patch, HADOOP-9361-007.patch, HADOOP-9361-008.patch, 
> HADOOP-9361-009.patch, HADOOP-9361-011.patch
>
>
> {{FileSystem}} and {{FileContract}} aren't tested rigorously enough -while 
> HDFS gets tested downstream, other filesystems, such as blobstore bindings, 
> don't.
> The only tests that are common are those of {{FileSystemContractTestBase}}, 
> which HADOOP-9258 shows is incomplete.
> I propose 
> # writing more tests which clarify expected behavior
> # testing operations in the interface being in their own JUnit4 test classes, 
> instead of one big test suite. 
> # Having each FS declare via a properties file what behaviors they offer, 
> such as atomic-rename, atomic-delete, umask, immediate-consistency -test 
> methods can downgrade to skipped test cases if a feature is missing.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to