[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14020308#comment-14020308
 ] 

Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-10641:
-----------------------------------------

Hey Konstantin and Plamen, have y'all given any thought to contributing the 
Coordination Engine somewhere other than the Hadoop project? Sounds like it's a 
pretty general-purpose system that other projects that have nothing to do with 
Hadoop might want to use. Seems to me like it might reasonably be a separate 
top-level Apache project, which Hadoop and HBase (and perhaps others) could 
then depend on. It might also make sense for it to be a sub-project of the 
ZooKeeper project, much like BookKeeper is.

With something this new that you presumably want to iterate on quickly, seems 
like a shame to have to wait around for a Hadoop release to be able to pick up 
an updated Coordination Engine.

> Introduce Coordination Engine
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-10641
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10641
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko
>            Assignee: Plamen Jeliazkov
>         Attachments: HADOOP-10641.patch, HADOOP-10641.patch, 
> HADOOP-10641.patch
>
>
> Coordination Engine (CE) is a system, which allows to agree on a sequence of 
> events in a distributed system. In order to be reliable CE should be 
> distributed by itself.
> Coordination Engine can be based on different algorithms (paxos, raft, 2PC, 
> zab) and have different implementations, depending on use cases, reliability, 
> availability, and performance requirements.
> CE should have a common API, so that it could serve as a pluggable component 
> in different projects. The immediate beneficiaries are HDFS (HDFS-6469) and 
> HBase (HBASE-10909).
> First implementation is proposed to be based on ZooKeeper.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to