[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14044681#comment-14044681
 ] 

Rushabh S Shah commented on HADOOP-9867:
----------------------------------------

Hey Vinayakaumar,
Thanks for checking out the patch and providing valuable feedback.
I did ran into this test  case while solving this jira.
I am going to file another jira for this specific test case (and a couple of 
more which I came across) since the test case you mentioned is not in the scope 
of this jira.

> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader does not handle multibyte record 
> delimiters well
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-9867
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9867
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: io
>    Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.23.9, 2.2.0
>         Environment: CDH3U2 Redhat linux 5.7
>            Reporter: Kris Geusebroek
>            Assignee: Vinayakumar B
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: HADOOP-9867.patch, HADOOP-9867.patch, HADOOP-9867.patch, 
> HADOOP-9867.patch
>
>
> Having defined a recorddelimiter of multiple bytes in a new InputFileFormat 
> sometimes has the effect of skipping records from the input.
> This happens when the input splits are split off just after a 
> recordseparator. Starting point for the next split would be non zero and 
> skipFirstLine would be true. A seek into the file is done to start - 1 and 
> the text until the first recorddelimiter is ignored (due to the presumption 
> that this record is already handled by the previous maptask). Since the re 
> ord delimiter is multibyte the seek only got the last byte of the delimiter 
> into scope and its not recognized as a full delimiter. So the text is skipped 
> until the next delimiter (ignoring a full record!!)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to