[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14074788#comment-14074788
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-10896:
------------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12657874/hadoop-10896.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+0 tests included{color}. The patch appears to be a
documentation patch that doesn't require tests.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common:
org.apache.hadoop.ha.TestZKFailoverControllerStress
org.apache.hadoop.ipc.TestIPC
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/4366//testReport/
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/4366//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Update compatibility doc to capture visibility of un-annotated classes/
> methods
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-10896
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10896
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: documentation
> Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Reporter: Karthik Kambatla
> Assignee: Karthik Kambatla
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: hadoop-10896.patch
>
>
> From discussion on email thread, we should add something to the effect of
> "Classes without annotations are to considered @Private. Class members
> without specific annotations inherit the annotations of the class."
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
