[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14213088#comment-14213088
 ] 

Chris Nauroth commented on HADOOP-11127:
----------------------------------------

bq. Apparently, we've made a prior decision to stop shipping a native build...

While validating the 2.6.0 release candidate, I noticed that we are in fact 
still shipping a libhadoop.so in the binary distribution.  Now I'm not sure 
what our official policy is.

{code}
[cnauroth@ubuntu:pts/4] hadoop-2.6.0                                            
                                    
> objdump -f lib/native/libhadoop.so

lib/native/libhadoop.so:     file format elf64-x86-64
architecture: i386:x86-64, flags 0x00000150:
HAS_SYMS, DYNAMIC, D_PAGED
start address 0x0000000000005f20
{code}


> Improve versioning and compatibility support in native library for downstream 
> hadoop-common users.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-11127
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11127
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: native
>            Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>         Attachments: HADOOP-11064.003.patch
>
>
> There is no compatibility policy enforced on the JNI function signatures 
> implemented in the native library.  This library typically is deployed to all 
> nodes in a cluster, built from a specific source code version.  However, 
> downstream applications that want to run in that cluster might choose to 
> bundle a hadoop-common jar at a different version.  Since there is no 
> compatibility policy, this can cause link errors at runtime when the native 
> function signatures expected by hadoop-common.jar do not exist in 
> libhadoop.so/hadoop.dll.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to