[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14516032#comment-14516032
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9984:
-----------------------------------

\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | patch |   0m  0s | The patch command could not apply 
the patch during dryrun. |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Patch URL | 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12606827/HADOOP-9984.015.patch |
| Optional Tests | javadoc javac unit findbugs checkstyle |
| git revision | trunk / feb68cb |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/6199/console |


This message was automatically generated.

> FileSystem#globStatus and FileSystem#listStatus should resolve symlinks by 
> default
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-9984
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9984
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: fs
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.0-beta
>            Reporter: Colin Patrick McCabe
>            Assignee: Colin Patrick McCabe
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: HADOOP-9984.001.patch, HADOOP-9984.003.patch, 
> HADOOP-9984.005.patch, HADOOP-9984.007.patch, HADOOP-9984.009.patch, 
> HADOOP-9984.010.patch, HADOOP-9984.011.patch, HADOOP-9984.012.patch, 
> HADOOP-9984.013.patch, HADOOP-9984.014.patch, HADOOP-9984.015.patch
>
>
> During the process of adding symlink support to FileSystem, we realized that 
> many existing HDFS clients would be broken by listStatus and globStatus 
> returning symlinks.  One example is applications that assume that 
> !FileStatus#isFile implies that the inode is a directory.  As we discussed in 
> HADOOP-9972 and HADOOP-9912, we should default these APIs to returning 
> resolved paths.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to