[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14579085#comment-14579085
 ] 

Hudson commented on HADOOP-11347:
---------------------------------

FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #2169 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/2169/])
HADOOP-11347. RawLocalFileSystem#mkdir and create should honor umask (Varun 
Saxena via Colin P. McCabe) (cmccabe: rev 
fc2ed4a1f9a19d61f5e3cb4fd843604f0c7fe95f)
* 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestLocalFileSystemPermission.java
* 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/RawLocalFileSystem.java
* hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/CHANGES.txt


> RawLocalFileSystem#mkdir and create should honor umask
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-11347
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11347
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: fs
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.0
>            Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>            Assignee: Varun Saxena
>              Labels: BB2015-05-RFC, incompatible
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HADOOP-11347.001.patch, HADOOP-11347.002.patch, 
> HADOOP-11347.004.patch, HADOOP-11347.03.patch, HADOOP-11347.05.patch
>
>
> The {{FileSystem}} and {{FileContext}} APIs are inconsistent in enforcement 
> of umask for newly created directories.  {{FileContext}} utilizes 
> configuration property {{fs.permissions.umask-mode}} and runs a separate 
> {{chmod}} call to guarantee bypassing the process umask.  This is the 
> expected behavior for Hadoop as discussed in the documentation of 
> {{fs.permissions.umask-mode}}.  For the equivalent {{FileSystem}} APIs, it 
> does not use {{fs.permissions.umask-mode}}.  Instead, the permissions end up 
> getting controlled by the process umask.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to