[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14608516#comment-14608516
 ] 

Hudson commented on HADOOP-12107:
---------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #2190 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/2190/])
HADOOP-12107. long running apps may have a huge number of StatisticsData 
instances under FileSystem (Sangjin Lee via Ming Ma) (mingma: rev 
8e1bdc17d9134e01115ae7c929503d8ac0325207)
* 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FCStatisticsBaseTest.java
* 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FileSystem.java
* hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/CHANGES.txt


> long running apps may have a huge number of StatisticsData instances under 
> FileSystem
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-12107
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12107
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: fs
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.0
>            Reporter: Sangjin Lee
>            Assignee: Sangjin Lee
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.8.0
>
>         Attachments: HADOOP-12107.001.patch, HADOOP-12107.002.patch, 
> HADOOP-12107.003.patch, HADOOP-12107.004.patch, HADOOP-12107.005.patch
>
>
> We observed with some of our apps (non-mapreduce apps that use filesystems) 
> that they end up accumulating a huge memory footprint coming from 
> {{FileSystem$Statistics$StatisticsData}} (in the {{allData}} list of 
> {{Statistics}}).
> Although the thread reference from {{StatisticsData}} is a weak reference, 
> and thus can get cleared once a thread goes away, the actual 
> {{StatisticsData}} instances in the list won't get cleared until any of these 
> following methods is called on {{Statistics}}:
> - {{getBytesRead()}}
> - {{getBytesWritten()}}
> - {{getReadOps()}}
> - {{getLargeReadOps()}}
> - {{getWriteOps()}}
> - {{toString()}}
> It is quite possible to have an application that interacts with a filesystem 
> but does not call any of these methods on the {{Statistics}}. If such an 
> application runs for a long time and has a large amount of thread churn, the 
> memory footprint will grow significantly.
> The current workaround is either to limit the thread churn or to invoke these 
> operations occasionally to pare down the memory. However, this is still a 
> deficiency with {{FileSystem$Statistics}} itself in that the memory is 
> controlled only as a side effect of those operations.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to