[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14958308#comment-14958308
 ] 

Sangjin Lee commented on HADOOP-12475:
--------------------------------------

The latest patch looks good for the most part.

A couple of nits: IMO it's generally a good practice to declare types with 
interfaces rather than concrete implementations:
{code}
129       private ConcurrentHashMap<ConnectionId, Connection> connections =
130         new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
{code}

I would use {{ConcurrentMap}} instead of {{ConcurrentHashMap}} as the type. 
Also line 130 has the checkstyle violation. It'd be good to fix it too.

> Replace guava Cache with ConcurrentHashMap for caching Connection in ipc 
> Client
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-12475
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12475
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: conf, io, ipc
>            Reporter: Walter Su
>            Assignee: Walter Su
>         Attachments: HADOOP-12475.01.patch, HADOOP-12475.02.patch
>
>
> quote [~daryn] from HADOOP-11772:
> {quote}
> CacheBuilder is obscenely expensive for concurrent map, and it requires 
> generating unnecessary garbage even just to look up a key. Replace it with 
> ConcurrentHashMap.
> I identified this issue that impaired my own perf testing under load. The 
> slowdown isn't just the sync. It's the expensive of Connection's ctor 
> stalling other connections. The expensive of ConnectionId#equals causes 
> delays. Synch'ing on connections causes unfair contention unlike a sync'ed 
> method. Concurrency simply hides this.
> {quote}
> BTW, guava Cache is heavyweight. Per local test, ConcurrentHashMap has better 
> overal performance.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to