On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Raghava Mutharaju < m.vijayaragh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Todd, > > Thank you for the reply. In the cluster I use here, apache Hadoop is > installed. So I have to use that. I am trying out HBase on my laptop first. > Even though I install CDH2, it won't be useful because on the cluster, I > have to work with apache Hadoop. Since version 0.21 is still in > development, > there should be a HDFS-630 patch for the current stable release of Hadoop > isn't it? > No, it was not considered for release in Hadoop 0.20.X because it breaks wire compatibility, and though I've done a workaround to avoid issues stemming from that, it would be unlikely to pass a backport vote. -Todd On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > Hi Raghava, > > > > Yes, that's a patch targeted at 0.20, but I'm not certain whether it > > applies > > on the vanilla 0.20 code or not. If you'd like a version of Hadoop that > > already has it applied and tested, I'd recommend using Cloudera's CDH2. > > > > -Todd > > > > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Raghava Mutharaju < > > m.vijayaragh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I am trying to install HBase and while going through the > requirements > > > (link below), it asked me to apply HDFS-630 patch. The latest 2 patches > > are > > > for Hadoop 0.21. I am using version 0.20. For this version, should I > > apply > > > Todd Lipcon's patch at > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12430230/hdfs-630-0.20.txt > > > . > > > Would this be the right patch to apply? The directory structures have > > > changed from 0.20 to 0.21. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Raghava. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
