You may not need nested map-reduce job. 

All you need to do is to use keys to partition the permutation. And duplicate 
the data from map. 

output.collect(1, value);
output.collect(2, value);
.
.
.
output.collect(n, value);

Then, set your reducer number to n. When you emit data in the mapper, the key 
is set to the reducer ID. 
In each reducer, you enumerate the permutation with prefix of reducer id.

You also need to ensure data are hash to the same reduce by implementing 

public class Record implements Writable,WritableComparable<Record>{

    public void readExternal(ObjectInput in) throws IOException { //xxx}
 
    public void writeExternal(ObjectOutput out) throws IOException {
                write(out); 
        }

        public int hashCode() { }
        
}

Hope this helps.

Mingxi

-----Original Message-----
From: venkataswamy [mailto:venkat.t...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2012 2:17 PM
To: core-u...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Nested map reduce job


Hi,
   I encountered a strange issue in developing a system. I have data where 
reducer recieves about 3 millions values. The reducer emits all the 
permutations of the values.

Reducer{
   List<values>
   FindPermutations(List<values>)
   foreach( permutation )
       emit( key, permutation )
}


It is feasible to hold values in memory to calculate permutations if the number 
of values are low i.e. say less than 10,000. Otherwise, this is not scalable 
even in computational point of view.

I tried to write the values into a file and move it to HDFS. Start a new 
mapreduce job for permutation from the reducer, this distributes the load of 
the reducer among available machines. let me call it as nested mapreduce job. 
The task waits until the nested job completes and uses the obtained result to 
emit the permutations. The parent job's task stills idle, so the nested job's 
tasks can run on the same tasktracker, but the tasktracker is not doing it. Is 
there a way to signal tasktracker that the current task is paused or sitting 
idle, but not to terminate.

All the available tasktrackers are running parent mapreduce job's tasks and the 
nested mapreduce job never getting resources to start and falling into deadlock 
scenario.

I can suspend parent task after starting a nested job for permutations, but it 
does continue from the same instruction when it resumes. In simple words, the 
parent task is not pausing but suspending.

Anybody got into this situation. If you have any thoughts on it please post it 
here.


All your help is appreciated.


Thanks,
Venkat




--
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Nested-map-reduce-job-tp33763485p33763485.html
Sent from the Hadoop core-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to