On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Dan Richelson <drichel...@tendrilinc.com> wrote: > Anecdotally I can say that Pig seems to scale down better than Hive. > We see this in tests- hive scripts running small amounts of data take > much longer than similar Pig scripts. Hive parallel settings are > enabled.
-- Same as in our case, for the small data pig seems to be much faster than hive. I think this has to do with the fact that there doesn't seem > to be a 'local' mode for hive- you have to run it as mapreduce jobs > (either embedded or on a cluster). Please correct me if I am wrong > here. -- I am not very sure whether this makes difference ? Regards Abhi > > > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Abhishek <abhishek.dod...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Can we discuss performance of pig vs hive >> >> 1) what hive is good at? >> 2) what pig is good at? >> 3) Hive optimizer vs pig optimizer >> 4) hive limitations vs pig limitations >> >> Regards >> Abhi >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> -- >> >> >> > > > > -- > Dan Richelson, Software Engineer > > Tendril > 2560 55th St. | Boulder, Colorado 80301 > M 303-709-2214 > www.tendrilinc.com > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. > Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely > those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. > Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the > presence of viruses. > The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus > transmitted by this email. > > -- > > >
