> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Is it just that no one is watching out for PropertyUtils, or the > > people who usually watch on it are busy? > > > > The latter. > > There is also an important philosophical issue here -- it > breaks conformance with standard JavaBeans definition of the > semantics for indexed properties, which does *not* include > List based support. That's worth some reflective discussion > first, and (so far) I remain somewhat unconvinced that we > should deviate here.
I would think that we *should* deviate. I would assume that this would be very useful, even if it doesn't follow the standard JavaBeans definition. In the end, it is all about easier access to an object. I think List access as an index adds value. But the question is, what do you so if you want to set() an indexed List property? Scott -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
