Why does the Rule class only provide a constructor that takes a Digester parameter? It is very annoying to have to provide a constructor for rules! Why can't you just add a setDigester() method to the Rule class and let a the Digester instance pass itself to it when the addRule() method is called (did that make sense)? Could a default constructor and a setDigester() method be added to future releases of the Rule class?
- Re: org.apache.commons.digester.Rule constructor... James Carman
- Re: org.apache.commons.digester.Rule constructo... robert burrell donkin
- Re: org.apache.commons.digester.Rule constr... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: org.apache.commons.digester.Rule constructo... robert burrell donkin
- RE: org.apache.commons.digester.Rule constructo... Scott Sanders
- Re: org.apache.commons.digester.Rule constr... robert burrell donkin