otisg wrote: > I think this would be a good thing to have in the interim. > I'd suggest you post the patches here and hopefully somebody with commit > priviledges can apply them. Maybe it will be better to produce two versions of package (JDK 1.4- and JDK 1.4), in the similar to Cactus way (Servlet API 2.2 and Servlet API 2.3). Tomek Pik [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thanks, > Otis -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4 Lev Assinovsky
- Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4 Andrus Adamchik
- Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4 Lev Assinovsky
- Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4 otisg
- Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4 Tomasz Pik
- Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4 Juozas Baliuka
- Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4 Lev Assinovsky
- Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4 Lev Assinovsky
- Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4 John McNally
- Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4 Lev Assinovsky
- Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4 Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4 Lev Assinovsky
- Re: [dbcp] JDBC 3.0 and JDK 1.4 otisg