On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Waldhoff, Rodney wrote:
> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 14:48:18 -0500
> From: "Waldhoff, Rodney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [pool] 1.0 release soon (was RE: [pool] PROPOSAL: add collecting
> of statistics to pool implementations)
>
> > I'd like to do one in the next day or so, if
> > there are no remaining gotcha bugs.
>
> I added an abstract BaseObjectPool this morning, for forward compatibility.
> I'd like to do the same for KeyedObjectPool, but it shouldn't take very
> long.
>
+1.
> I've been expanding the docs a bit today, but that could continue after a
> 1.0 release, it's really just improving the online site.
>
Either way is fine with me.
> If anyone is strongly bothered by ObjectPool.numIdle() and
> ObjectPool.numActive() versus the getXXX() style, now might be the right
> time to change it, although it may already be too late depending upon how
> broadly pool is being used.
>
How about adding getXxx() versions, implement the old ones in terms of
them, and deprecate the old ones?
> Thoughts?
>
Craig
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
