On Fri, 24 May 2002, Jack, Paul wrote: > > Extending AbstractMap is not the right way to add an equals, > > hashcode and > > toString method. I just committed real implementations for > > the methods. > > Was there something wrong with AbstractMap's implementations, > or did you just want to keep SequencedHashMap's superclass > as Object? I'm just wondering if there's something my > unit tests aren't catching...
Just wanted to keep the superclass as Object. I suppose it doesn't make that much of a difference really, so my statement on it being "not the right way" is probably a bit harsh. Sorry about that. :) regards michael -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
