On Wed, 29 May 2002, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 19:36:05 +0100
> From: robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Digester - why is peekParams() package-protected?
>
> On Wednesday, May 29, 2002, at 06:33 AM, Scott Sanders wrote:
>
> > Well, you _should_ start as protective as possible, and then open up
> > from there.
> >
> > Sounds like you have a need for it to be public. I have no objections.
> >
> > Robert?
>
> it'll be hard to code effective CallParamRule subclasses without making it
> public.
>
> so i'm +1
>
Likewise ... makes sense to me.
> - robert
Craig
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
