I've been coding up the new reflection handling code (low level) for [lang]. And I've discovered that the Sun implementation (1.3.1) is screwed. Consider:
Class A. Defines _public_ field named 'number' value 1 Class B. Subclass of A. Defines _private_ field named 'number' value 2 Interface I. Defines _public static final_ field named 'number' value 3 Class C. Subclass of B, implements I. What value does 'number' have if you reference it from C ??? Testing shows it is 3, because the private field in B hides the public field in A. However, Java reflection will give you the field on A if you request it passing in C. In other words Java 1.3.1 Sun reflection is screwed. I've just tested it on Sun's 1.4.0 however and it gives the correct answer. Now, I can work around this, doing lots of searches and the like, but it will slow things down a lot. - So how accurate do we need to be?? - Should I code the workaround just for 1.3 java?? - What about non-Sun implementations?? - What about 1.2?? - Do we care anyway, as its such a peculiar case?? Stephen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>