Eric, I apologize for the confusion. I caused it by doing some commits without discussing them first. The request was made (rightfully so) for me to undo them, and I agreed to do that. That is why MetadataReader is leaving. Again, I apologize for causing the confusion and potentially wasted work. If MetadataReader.java is useful and should be preserved, discussion can certainly be held to put it back.
Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] a.k.a Mungo Knotwise of Michel Delving "One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them..." -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:EPugh@;upstate.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [sql] diff between JDBCMetaData and MetaDataReader? Argh x 2 then... I am going to stop doing work and wait until someone can give me a clear direction on what the future of the SQL package is for MetadataReader, and what (hopefully ;-) ) it's timeline is. I finished adding to MetadataReader support for Primary Keys and Foreign Keys, as well as testcases for MetadataReader and Axion and HsqlDb databases. I also tweaked DataSourceWrapper, and Table. I am attaching my cvs diff - u in an attachement to this email plus my testcases. Hopefully some of this code that I have worked on can be useful in the future. Eric Pugh -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:scaswel2@;bellsouth.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:42 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [sql] diff between JDBCMetaData and MetaDataReader? io/MetadataReader.java is going away > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: 2002/10/23 Wed AM 08:16:09 EDT > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [sql] diff between JDBCMetaData and MetaDataReader? > > Hi all, > > I am trying to move forward with decoupling the metadata and the xml > representation of that metadata for the SQL package. I have attached a > patch that makes the code at least compile. However, I was getting ready to > write a testcase, and noticed that for all intents and purposes, > io/MetaDataReader.java and datamodel/JDBCMetaData.java seem the same! So > which one is going to be sticking around? I notice the ant task uses the > datamodel/JDBCMetaData.java class. Or am I missing something? > > Eric Pugh > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
