+1 for choice #2
Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] a.k.a Mungo Knotwise of Michel Delving "One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them..." > -----Original Message----- > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:bayard@;generationjava.com] > Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:49 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [Lang] Release 1.1? [wasRe: [Lang] Please fix this] > > > > They seem to be the choices. > > We have: > > 1) > 1.0.1 release asap. This includes the NumericRange bugfix and > any other bugfixes that can be dredged together. A branch > would be made of tag LANG_1_0 and the bugfixes retroactively applied. > > 2) > > 1.1 release in slightly more time. We look to make a release > with new functionality. We ignore certain elements if they > are not wanting to go out, ie) functor/reflect, but > everything else goes out. > > > Postives for 1) are, we get it out quicker, but it's a lot > more fiddly and involves a fair amount of time. > > Positives for 2) are, we continue our desire to release > often, and we get other fixes out etc. Rather than fiddling > around branching we spend time learning our process for a 2nd > release [ie) a lot of the 1.0 release things were special as > they were the first time]. > > > I'm +1 for 2). > > Hen > > > > > On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I would support a release (1.1 or 1.0.1?).... > > > > I haven't yet had a chance to review the functor package now its in > > [lang] (I'm away from home on business ATM). > > > > ClassUtils, ArrayUtils and all of the reflect package should be > > excluded at present. > > > > A few other bugs have been sorted too. It would be good to > see a list > > of changes from 1.0. > > > > IMHO, we should wait a week or so to allow more chance to look at > > functor, and then make a 1.1 release if its all OK. > > > > Stephen > > > > > > > from: robert burrell donkin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 20:08:09 > > > to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > subject: Re: [Lang] Please fix this > > > > > > i feel very strongly that the code in reflect is not ready to be > > > released. > > > > > > in particular, i would not like to see the current method > names and > > > structure become fixed by future requirements for backwards > > > compatibility > > > (just) yet. > > > > > > (gorden bennett! i've only made one commit and i'm > already sounding > > > like i own the shop ;) > > > > > > - robert > > > > > > On Thursday, November 7, 2002, at 07:15 PM, Steve Downey wrote: > > > > > > > I agree that CVS head is not in a releaseable state. > But the bug > > > > is fairly compelling. I think releasing off a branch from the > > > > release tag is the best solution. > > > > > > > > On Thursday 07 November 2002 12:05 pm, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > >> Fixed in CVS, so will be in the nightly build tonight > at the very > > > >> least. And UnitTest made so Max and Min are being tested. > > > >> > > > >> Any views out there on the merits of a release? > > > >> > > > >> My judgement is that the current CVS tree is not > releasable, so > > > >> it would be a question of releasing against the tag. > > > >> > > > >> Any other bugs that should be included? > > > >> > > > >> Hen > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Kasper Rönning wrote: > > > >>> Quite a bug in Commons-Lang: class NumberRange, method > > > >>> geMaximum() returns minimum. Could you make a new release? > > > >>> > > > >>> /Kasper Ronning > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > >>> <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For > > > >>> additional commands, e-mail: > > > >>> <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > org> > > > > > For additional > commands, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache. > > > > org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For > additional commands, e-mail: > > > <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For > additional commands, > e-mail: > > <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
