DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15160>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15160 speedup for beanutils / array getter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-08 14:53 ------- Ok, this one works. I don't think that this particular patch has any great relevance, but I just wanted to show that sometimes an array-centric approach spares instances as well as execution time. Alas, there is no load test suite available and the default tests only use small array sizes so there is no significant difference in the execution time. But if consequently arrays with a fixed size would be used wherever the size is known in advance, much memory-reallocation could be spared. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
