Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Sean Schofield wrote:+1 for me then as well. ("time" is ok but lets leave DateUtils classname alone for now)
Can we review what classes we have now and what packages they belong in.Matches my list.
By my count we have DateUtils (which may be renamed to DateFormatUtils),
CalendarUtils and FastDateFormat.
As for the packages I think we have discussed
'org.apache.commons.lang.time' any others?
What about 'org.apache.commons.lang.date'?For me, time wins over date as it more correctly addresses the real scope.
'Date' was always a misnamed class for 'InstantInTime' and we'd not want
to limit ourselves to the real 'Date' things.
Are we agreed that we should move
to a new subpackage at this point with 3 classes?
It seems to be leaning that way. I'm +1 on it.Hen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Do others have thoughts/votes on this?
- sean
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>