DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15438>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15438 ArrayUtils.contains() ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-19 17:58 ------- I agree with the intent behind this proposed addition to ArrayUtils. However, I would prefer a broader solution: int ArrayUtils.indexOf(Object[] array, Object objectToFind) int ArrayUtils.indexOf(Object[] array, Object objectToFind, int startIndex) int ArrayUtils.lastIndexOf(Object[] array, Object objectToFind) int ArrayUtils.lastIndexOf(Object[] array, Object objectToFind, int startIndex) int ArrayUtils.contains(Object[] array, Object objectToFind) ie. the contains method would be built upon a full set of index methods. Are you interested in providing a patch? I would apply one as described above with test cases ;-) Stephen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
