+1
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog:      http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work:      http://www.multitask.com.au


Morgan Delagrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 22/01/2003 03:21:38 AM:

> Neither can I, when I use jdk 1.3.1.  Sigh.  Well, the
> individual taglib builds are more important than the
> reactor build, so I guess we roll back to the original
> format, yes?
> 
> - Morgan
> 
> --- James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Though I've now found that each individual library
> > cannot be built, without
> > putting back in the "file:" as follows in
> > project.xml...
> > 
> >     <!ENTITY commonDeps SYSTEM
> > "file:../../commonDependencies.ent">
> > 
> > Which I presume would mean reversing the patch to
> > get the reactor to work?
> > Sometimes I wish java supported "cd" then the
> > Reactor could just cd into
> > each subproject and problem solved :-)
> > 
> > James
> > -------
> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "robert burrell donkin"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 9:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: [jelly] Taglib split out - done?
> > 
> > 
> > > hi morgan
> > >
> > > attached is a patch which allows the ant tag to
> > build. (you'll probably
> > > need to go through all the tags and change the
> > other project.xml files in
> > > a similar way.)
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 06:55 PM, Morgan
> > Delagrange wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > --- robert burrell donkin
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 05:33 PM,
> > Morgan
> > > >> Delagrange wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --- James Strachan
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>> From: "Morgan Delagrange"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >>>>> --- James Strachan
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I'm gonna sit on the fence a little as I
> > agree
> > > >>>> with
> > > >>>>>> both of you. Before a
> > > >>>>>> 1.0 release I'd like to
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> * provide a simple build to build and test
> > all
> > > >>>> the
> > > >>>>>> libraries (hopefully
> > > >>>>>> using Maven reactor though anything would
> > do).
> > > >>>> This
> > > >>>>>> can help in refactoring,
> > > >>>>>> testing that we don't break things.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Everything appears to be correct in the
> > reactor.
> > > >>>> I
> > > >>>>> verified via debug statements that the parse
> > > >> fails
> > > >>>>> when MavenUtils.getProject(File,
> > > >>>> MavenJellyContext,
> > > >>>>> boolean) attempts to parse the
> > projectDescriptor
> > > >>>> with
> > > >>>>> Betwixt via the BeanReader.parse(File)
> > method.
> > > >>>> That
> > > >>>>> method seems to be inherited from Digester,
> > and
> > > >>>> looks
> > > >>>>> fine:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>     public Object parse(File file)
> > > >>>>>       throws IOException, SAXException {
> > > >>>>>         configure();
> > > >>>>>         InputSource input =
> > > >>>>>           new InputSource(new
> > > >>>> FileInputStream(file));
> > > >>>>>         input.setSystemId("file://" +
> > > >>>>>           file.getAbsolutePath());
> > > >>>>>         getXMLReader().parse(input);
> > > >>>>>         return (root);
> > > >>>>>     }
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Wierd.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Is this one of those problems of the current
> > > >> working
> > > >>>> directory being
> > > >>>> different (when built using the reactor) to
> > what
> > > >> it
> > > >>>> is when just building
> > > >>>> one library at a time?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> James
> > > >>>
> > > >>> That's the apparent difference, although
> > > >> Digester's
> > > >>> invocation of the
> > InputSource.setSystemId(String)
> > > >>> method should have made this a non-issue.
> > > >>
> > > >> if you can tell me a simple way to reproduce
> > the
> > > >> problem, i'd be willing
> > > >> to take a look and see if i can come up with
> > > >> anything.
> > > >>
> > > >> - robert
> > > >
> > > > I don't have a simple test case for it.  If you
> > go to
> > > > jakarta-commons-sandbox/jelly/jelly-tags/ant and
> > run
> > > > "maven java:compile", there is no problem. 
> > However if
> > > > you run "maven tags-build" from
> > > > jakarta-commons-sandbox/jelly, Maven will fail
> > to open
> > > > the commonsDependencies.ent file referenced in
> > the ant
> > > > build script.
> > > >
> > > > - Morgan
> > > >
> > > > =====
> > > > Morgan Delagrange
> > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs
> > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
> > > > http://axion.tigris.org
> > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog
> > > >
> > > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
> > now.
> > > > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED].
> > > > org>
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED].
> > > > org>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> > http://uk.my.yahoo.com
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> 
> 
> =====
> Morgan Delagrange
> http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
> http://axion.tigris.org
> http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 

> ForwardSourceID:NT000A612A 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to