On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:07:19AM -0500, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: > > I tried to read to the end of the thread so far before replying. > If the feeling is that the classes will see more use distributed > separately from HttpClient, I concur with Henri's assessment below. > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hen > ri Yandell writes: > > > >I'm +1 to commons-uri. > > > >As Tim points out, it's not just URLs, so we could even have pieces of > >code for dealing with ISBNs etc if the need arose. > > > >I don't think they really tie well to commons-io, and losing them in > >commons-net would be a mistake probably.
What about commons-naming? incze --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
