> > as [current-loggers-name] is not exposed by Log. Would it be acceptable
> > to add a getName() or something similar to the Log interface and the
> > implementations? That way, we can fully implement the avalon-framework
> > Logger contract on top of commons-logging.
>
> +1.
>
> Seems reasonable to me. I guess it won't break anyones code who just use
> commons-logging to log. The only risk is people who implement Log, but since
> most of the implementations are inside commons-logging, it doesn't seem too
> bad.
+1 definitely.
-bob
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
