Re: [POOL] Pool listeners

[Tim Funk]

Would it be better to use some type of action code instead?
For (a bad) example:
  public final static int BORROW=0;
  public final static int RETURN=1;
  public final static int CREATE=2;
...
Then the event could be fired by:
listenEvent(int action, Object o) and the implementor can use a switch 
to implement the correct action and not worry about implementing every 
method.

This way, it is easier to maintain backwards compatibility in case of 
new listen events being introduced.

-Tim

Quinton McCombs wrote:
I am working on a patch to allow listeners to be added to pools that
will receive notifications on various events.  Does anyone object to
having this functionality included?
Here is the design - 

I was thinking about adding support for a PoolListener interface for the
pool component.  Object which implement this interface could be added to
any ObjectPool or KeyedObjectPool. 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]