That sounds right to me, but perhaps someone more intimately involved with
the AbandonedObjectPool stuff can comment.

On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Mario Ivankovits wrote:

> Rodney,
>
> > Hence a long running transaction will not be impacted by idle object
> > eviction.
> > The "AbandonedObjectPool" has different (orthogonal) semantics, dealing
> > with how long an active object has been active, I think by design.
>
> you are right. I would like to use the "Abandoned" configuration, and i
> think we should reset the idle-time on every access on the connection. At
> least in
> createStatement
> Statement.execute*
> ResultSet.next*/prev* and the other navigation methods.
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to