DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17894>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17894

Unable to configure commons-logging SimpleLog for a webapp





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-25 21:02 -------
>>this bug is present into the current release (LogFactoryImpl v1.22), but not
>>in the 1.0.2 (there was another bug, if there is log4j present, the
>>LogFactoryImpl uses always the ProxyFactory from log4J)

Hmmm? My testing indicates that both 1.0.2 and 3/25/03 nightly always use log4j 
when it's present. If log4j is present, both builds appear to ignore the 
following commons-logging.properties entries:

org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory=org.apache.commons.logging.impl.LogFactory
Impl
org.apache.commons.logging.Log=org.apache.commons.logging.impl.Jdk14Logger
-OR-
org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory=org.apache.commons.logging.impl.LogFactory
Impl
org.apache.commons.logging.Log=org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SimpleLog


>>just for information, 
>>in the current version, the default logClassName is JDK 1.4 , and that's why 
>>you get the following format:
>>....

Yep, I figured that out. I was just using that as proof that it worked in 1.0.2.

Thanks, Nathan.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to