I agree with Tim, Howard should just be granted karma I believe... +1 otherwise Stephen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:59 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] sandbox karma for "Howard M. Lewis Ship"[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> +1, but I'm not really sure if this is a binding vote. Assume, I'm > voting as Commons committer *only*. > > I'm a little confused, my understanding of the current system is: Any > Jakarta Committer can simply ask for karma to the sandbox. Someone like > Craig usually just makes the appropriate changes to the avail file (or > so I assume), and the deal is done. > > So, Tapestry just navigated the Incubator, and is now a part of > Jakarta. Howard is a Jakarta committer, and all he has to do is ask. > That's straightforward, no PMC vote, no Commons Committer vote needed. > I believe that someone just needs to give him karma - that would be in > line with past practices. > > The confusing part comes in when someone who is not a Jakarta Committer > wants access to the commons-sandbox. I think people just wanted > non-Jakarta committers to have the approval of the Jakarta PMC before > being granted karma. I'm not batting for that "side" per se, but the > PMC maintains an oversight role for new committers (i.e. requests for > new accounts come from the PMC) - the "opposition" in this case just > wants the PMC to have some oversight when a non-Jakarta committer > requests access. Does that make any sense? > > In Howard's case, he's a Tapestry committer - I don't see the need for a > vote. > > > > > > (which includes a lot of Ant, DB, James, Maven committers > > > On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 18:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > +1 > > -- > > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > > Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog > > Work: http://www.multitask.com.au > > > > > > robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30/05/2003 07:27:29 > > AM: > > > > > Howard M. Lewis Ship (well known as a leading light of the recently > > > incubated tapestry project) would like access to the commons-sandbox in > > > order to work on a new component as outlined below in the following > > email: > > > > > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-dev&m=105416555202303&w=2 > > > > > > i'd like to propose that we grant him karma. > > > > > > (i know that the debate about processes is still on going but i thought > > > that might as well have an example to talk about ;) > > > > > > - robert > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
