> ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-25 01:16
> -------
> I'll apply this, but its really alot easier to apply "cvs generated patches"
> over tarballs or unix diff. I would prefer this format over all others.
>
> Not only does cvs diff generate patches directly against the cvs copies,
> assuring your diffing against whats presently in the cvs, but you can also
> add
> files using it. In otherwords, if you create a file and the run cvs diff on
> the
> directory, when I apply the patch, the file will be created.
Mark, I would have used cvs diff, but the file I was patching wasn't in CVS
yet, so I had to patch the patch attached to the bug report. I didn't want to
wait until the original patch was committed and possibly forget to even propose
my patch.
Al
=====
Albert Davidson Chou
Get answers to Mac questions at http://www.Mac-Mgrs.org/ .
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
