We should still show protected which is handy when subclassing. Gary
-----Original Message----- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 08:23 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: public javadoc only Was: [lamg] Re: Release of Commons Lang 2.0 (take 2) On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > The zip file has the following issues: > - ReleaseNotes.txt refers to the 1.0 version Working on new ReleaseNotes and on updating STATUS.html. > - Javadoc includes non-public scoped classes Up until now, we've had the private option turned on for Javadoc. Just want to confirm that everyone is happy with not showing non-public javadoc? [I'm pretty sure the same can be done for the Javadiff tool] Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
