+1 to Maven, and +1 to Phil's suggested approach.
Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] a.k.a Mungo Knotwise of Michel Delving "One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them..." > -----Original Message----- > From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 2:10 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [lang] Looking to the next version > > > Henri Yandell wrote: > > One idea I'd like to throw into the mix for the next > version of Lang > > [or maybe it'd still be 2.0 in this case] is to move to a > Maven site > > and use Maven as our primary build. > > > > While we're getting Lang out the door, I thought I'd see > what people's > > reaction is to this. > > > > We'd get a proper clover licence and publish that, I > imagine JDiff can > > be integrated in, etc etc. > > +1 -- especially the clover license bit. I would wait to change over > until post 2.0 though, when we can also build out the web > site a little > better. As a half-measure, we could patch project.xml to make maven > work better now. I have a locally modified version that I > could diff if > we want to do that. > > > > > Hen > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
