It was my misunderstanding. I haven't used the reflect code, and I assumed it was part of the 2.0 release. I was surprised, then, that Stephen wanted to replace it with sandbox code; he's usually so strict about such things! Now that the situation is more clear, I'm fine with the move (although I'm starting to get concerned that instead of one nice lang library I'm gonna need 5 smaller ones. But I'll survive.).
+1 for tagging. .T. > -----Original Message----- > From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:50 PM > To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' > Subject: Re: [lang] Remove reflect code? > > hi todd > > i agree with stephen. there shouldn't be too much difference between > rolling your own distribution from CVS whether it's lang or reflect. if > you do care about reflect then what it needs (before it can be promoted) > are (IMHO) a lot of well written unit tests. if you have some time and > would like to see reflect pushed on, maybe you'd like to contribute at > least a few. > > BTW i'm +1 about removing reflect from lang but could we tag before it's > removed so that people can build the lang reflect stuff from the tag if > they wish. > > - robert > > On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 11:22 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > > I should clarify, the reflection code in [lang] wasn't released in the > > recent 2.0 release, and is in effect sandbox code in the wrong place. > > > > Stephen > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Todd Jonker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> This doesn't seem appropriate until [reflect] moves out of the sandbox > >> and > > has a 1.0 release. > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 09:18 PM > >>> To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' > >>> Subject: [lang] Remove reflect code? > >>> > >>> Are we OK with removing the reflect code from [lang] now? > >>> [reflect] in the sandbox contains the code now so having it in [lang] > > still > >>> is just confusing... > >>> > >>> I will remove it soon, unless someone objects. > >>> > >>> Stephen > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
