On Sunday, September 28, 2003, at 08:43 AM, Sgarlata Matt wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 10:39 PM
Subject: [beanutils] some ideas

<snip>


Solutions could be either:

1) Improve the system for the mapping converters so it is many-to-many.

2) Create a hierarchy structure. A ConvertUtilsBeansConverter could be
plugged in to handle a class, and would contain its own batch of
Converters.

Any ideas?

I think the Converter interface is fine, but could perhaps use some better documentation and examples (in the JavaDoc... the converters in the distribution seem more general-purpose than will be the converters a user needs to create). I do like the idea of adding a new ConvertUtils.register(Converter, Class from, Class to) method.

this (and related issues) have come up before. i've thought about this quite a lot and i'm in favour of making the conversion pluggable strategy.
this would allow both different and more sophisticated conversion algorithms to be created without breaking backwards compatibility. i don't realistically have the time to go about the creation of new implementations right now but i can certainly point people in the right direction if they want to go down this route.


BTW stephen has talked before about creating a separate component that would provide sophisticated solutions to the issue posed by conversion. it might be a good idea to involve him in any design discussions. i now also that ted (of struts fame) is interested in the conversion problem so there may be enough momentum to at least think about creating a dedicated component.

- robert


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to