I grokk why now. Xxx is primitives, so an utter pain to deal with generically. My 'easily' below is a massive over-statement :)
Still would be nice if when I change the LongConverter in a system, the default is that the LongArrayConverter also changes its atomic behaviour. Hen On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Looking at the converters, there is a batch of XxxArrayConverters. These > extend AbstractArrayConverter which has the code necessary to parse a > comma delimited array. > > My question being, why does CharacterArrayConverter et al even exist? > > It seems that there could easily be an ArrayConverter which is created > with a Converter object and optionally another Object which is the default > value. If no array default, then it would return a similar array based on > the value returned from the passed in converter [which might be its > default]. > > Am I missing something? > > Hen > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]