DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24962>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24962 [math] MathUtils.sign(NaN) returns -1 instead of NaN ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-26 00:01 ------- I'm OK with sign( NaN ) == NaN, but the issue of sign( 0 ) == +1 or 0 is also in dispute. It's really this latter issue that makes me say we need a new method to implement the return value being zero. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
