DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25154>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25154 [collections] IteratorChain bug with empty iterators. [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID Summary|IteratorChain bug with empty|[collections] IteratorChain |iterators. |bug with empty iterators. ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-04 17:11 ------- A test for this bug (below) in TestIteratorChain has been present since version 1.3 of the testcase (currently on version 1.6). It looks like to checks the same condition you point out and it does pass in the current build. Please take a look and reopen the bug if there's a difference I've missed. public void testFirstIteratorIsEmptyBug() { List empty = new ArrayList(); List notEmpty = new ArrayList(); notEmpty.add("A"); notEmpty.add("B"); notEmpty.add("C"); IteratorChain chain = new IteratorChain(); chain.addIterator(empty.iterator()); chain.addIterator(notEmpty.iterator()); assertTrue("should have next",chain.hasNext()); assertEquals("A",chain.next()); assertTrue("should have next",chain.hasNext()); assertEquals("B",chain.next()); assertTrue("should have next",chain.hasNext()); assertEquals("C",chain.next()); assertTrue("should not have next",!chain.hasNext()); } --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
