Prepare for the worst :) esp. Avoid inline conditionals comes to mind... Mvgr, Martin
On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 06:42, Henri Yandell wrote: > Sounds good. Why not just grab dbcp's and see what we (our code) disagree > with? :) > > Hen > > On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Phil Steitz wrote: > > > Gary Gregory wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Since we now have checkstyle.xml, can we remove checkstyle.properties? > > > > > > Gary > > > > +1 > > > > We should also think about updating this. When I created checkstyle.xml, > > I just translated from the existing checkstyle.properties. There is not > > much in there. That's OK with me personally, but if we want to consider a > > more aggressive set of checks, we might want to do some "comparative > > shopping" among the other commons components. One that has a pretty > > comprehensive set of checks is [dbcp]. > > > > Phil > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mvdb.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
