DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26260>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26260 RowSetDynaClass hardcodes BasicDynaBean Summary: RowSetDynaClass hardcodes BasicDynaBean Product: Commons Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: Bean Utilities AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A suggestion to allow users to flexibly subclass RowSetDynaClass... The current RowSetDynaClass implementation has a method "copy(ResultSet resultSet)" which has a hardcoded "new BasicDynaBean(this)". Instead, perhaps it should use "this.newInstance()". RowSetDynaClass.newInstance() should then of course be implemented as "return new BasicDynaBean(this)" instead of throwing an exception. A subclass of RowSetDynaClass can then specify its own DynaBean subclasses, rather than be forced to use the hardcoded BasicDynaBean. thanks, [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
