Okay, I put the missing code back in.. It would be nice to have a unit test that caught that.
Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Oliver Heger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 11:07 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: ConfigurationFactory and hierarchicalDom4j > > > This is strange: If you have a look at the source xrefs for the > ConfigurationFactory class at > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/configuration/xref/org/apach > e/commons/configuration/ConfigurationFactory.html > you will see that the missing rule is present. So it must have been > accidently deleted in one of the last commits(?). > Oliver > > Eric Pugh schrieb: > > > Oliver, would you like to submit a patch for this? Also, > if you could submit a unit test showing the problem.. Not > good when all the unit tests pass, but a bug still exists! > > > > In terms of a release, basically we are just wrangling over > whether to throw a ConfigurationException.. At this point, > the feeling seems to be that no good solution really exists > right now. We need (in Configuration 2 or 1.5 or whatever) > to refactor the process of loading a configuration object > from the process of having a configuration object. That way > cool stuff like multiple reloading strategies etc become possible. > > > > At this point, there are a coupld throws Exception that I > am going to replace with a checked > ConfigurationInitializationException or ConfigurationLoadException... > > > > So, 1.0 is coming down the pike very soon.. > > > > Eric > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Oliver Kim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 8:27 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: ConfigurationFactory and hierarchicalDom4j > > > > > > You guys probably would have figured this out pretty > quickly, but since I found it, I thought I'd let you know... > > > > The following code snipped should contain a rule for > hierarchicalDom4j: > > > > protected void initDigesterSectionRules(Digester digester, > > String matchString, boolean additional) > > { > > setupDigesterInstance( > > digester, > > matchString + "properties", > > new > BasePathConfigurationFactory(PropertiesConfiguration.class), > > METH_LOAD, > > additional); > > setupDigesterInstance( > > digester, > > matchString + "dom4j", > > new > BasePathConfigurationFactory(DOM4JConfiguration.class), > > METH_LOAD, > > additional); > > setupDigesterInstance( > > digester, > > matchString + "jndi", > > new JNDIConfigurationFactory(), > > null, > > additional); > > } > > > > > > Like so: > > > > protected void initDigesterSectionRules(Digester digester, > > String matchString, boolean additional) > > { > > setupDigesterInstance( > > digester, > > matchString + "properties", > > new > BasePathConfigurationFactory(PropertiesConfiguration.class), > > METH_LOAD, > > additional); > > setupDigesterInstance( > > digester, > > matchString + "dom4j", > > new > BasePathConfigurationFactory(DOM4JConfiguration.class), > > METH_LOAD, > > additional); > > setupDigesterInstance( > > digester, > > matchString + "hierarchicalDom4j", > > new > BasePathConfigurationFactory(HierarchicalDOM4JConfiguration.class), > > METH_LOAD, > > additional); > > setupDigesterInstance( > > digester, > > matchString + "jndi", > > new JNDIConfigurationFactory(), > > null, > > additional); > > } > > > > It seems to work fine once you do this. > > > > As an aside? How close do you think Configuration is to > release? I'm considering using it in one of my projects. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Oliver Kim > > > -- > Oliver Heger > Zentrale Informationsverarbeitung (ZIV) / Bereich Anwenderverfahren > Klinikum der Philipps-UniversitÃt Marburg > BunsenstraÃe 3, > D-35037 Marburg > Tel: +49 6421 28-66592 > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]