Most commons sites are currently built as follows as far as I can see:
- Maven 1.0 RC1
(standard build accessible to everyone, would give dark header)
- xdocs/style/project.css, as per collections
(lightens the header and centres the jakarta logo)
- project.properties
maven.xdoc.date=left
- xdocs/navigation.xml
<links>
<item name="Jakarta Commons"
href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/"/>
</links>
(to give breadcrumb link to commons)
I believe this combination (as per collections/lang/codec/... works well).
In particular, the font sizes are much better than maven HEAD, and the light
section heads of maven HEAD just don't work for me.
Stephen
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On 28 Jan 2004, at 20:11, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> >
> > > I noticed that the beanutils site uses a different (maven 1.1?)
> > > stylesheet
> > > to the rest of commons. IMO, the rest of commons style looks better
> > > (no red
> > > text etc). Was this a deliberate choice or just what you have
> > > installed?
> >
> > i upgraded to CVS HEAD so that i could get the lighter look and feel
> > (which tim used when he regenerated digester etc). i quite like the red
> > but i'd be very happy to use a standard commons L&F if there is a skin
> > around in CVS (and some instructions about the right way to use it).
>
> FWIW, I like it (the "light" look) too, actually, except for the amount of
> vertical space the headings take up.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
