On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, robert burrell donkin wrote: > On 4 Feb 2004, at 19:52, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > IIRC i think licensing is closed. i think license is open. (hopefully > someone will correct me if i'm wrong) Sounds good. I couldn't find anything on the website about it [the legal page should specify it I would have thought]. I didn't check the mail2 page though. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Relicensing to the Apache ... Geir Magnusson Jr
- Re: Relicensing to the Apa... robert burrell donkin
- Re: Relicensing to the Apa... Emmanuel Bourg
- RE: Relicensing to the Apache License 2.0 ? Gary Gregory
- Re: Relicensing to the Apache License 2.0 ? Mark R. Diggory
- Re: Relicensing to the Apache License 2.0 ? John McNally
- Re: Relicensing to the Apache License 2... Mark R. Diggory
- RE: Relicensing to the Apache License 2.0 ? Martin Cooper
- Re: Relicensing to the Apache License 2.0 ? Stephen Colebourne
- Re: Relicensing to the Apache License 2.0 ? robert burrell donkin
- Re: Relicensing to the Apache License 2.0 ? Henri Yandell
- Re: Relicensing to the Apache License 2.0 ? Craig R. McClanahan