That's the version I'm using. +1 to losing maven!
Geoff ----- Original Message ----- From: "Howard M. Lewis Ship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Jakarta Commons Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 9:18 AM Subject: RE: [Hivemind] build hivemind in eclipse? > This is why we're going to get away from Maven. The exact version of Maven you have seems very > significant. All I can say is that I'm using 1.0-rc2-SNAPSHOT. Does that help? Maybe not. > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant > Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components > http://howardlewisship.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Geoff Longman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 11:27 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Hivemind] build hivemind in eclipse? > > > > > > I got the missing MAVEN_REPO classpath variable errors so I > > installed maven > > and ran > > > > >maven full-site > > > > and added the MAVEN_REPO classpath variable. > > > > All the errors are gone except this one: > > > > Error Missing required library: 'C:Documents and > > Settings/Administrator/.maven/repository/jboss/jars/jboss-jmx- > > 3.0.6.jar'. > > > > Although, the maven build did tank after a while with this: > > > > +---------------------------------------- > > | Generating site for HiveMind Framework > > | Memory: 12M/13M > > +---------------------------------------- > > > > BUILD FAILED > > File...... file:/C:/Documents and > > Settings/Administrator/.maven/plugins/maven-multiproject-plugin-1.1/ > > Element... maven:reactor > > Line...... 69 > > Column.... 7 > > Unable to obtain goal [site] -- file:/C:/Documents and > > Settings/Administrator/.maven/plugins/maven-site-plugin-1.3/:22:42: > > <attainGo > > al> Goal [xdoc:register-reports] has no action definition. > > Total time: 46 seconds > > Finished at: Sat Mar 06 22:47:33 EST 2004 > > > > What am I doing wrong? BTW I just pulled the latest code out > > of CVS and got > > the same error. > > > > Geoff > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Geoff Longman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Tapestry development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 10:27 PM > > Subject: Re: [Hivemind] Tapestry/HttpSession service > > > > > > > Ahh, but we're trying to reduce our dependency on the > > Visit. We have many > > > groups of pages, and each group needs to store a distinct > > set of data. Our > > > visit class was becoming a mess. > > > > > > Plus, a session local service could also be useful outside > > of Tapestry > > where > > > there is no Visit! No reason why a JSP couldn't use a session local > > service. > > > > > > Geoff > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Harish Krishnaswamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Tapestry development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 10:14 PM > > > Subject: Re: [Hivemind] Tapestry/HttpSession service > > > > > > > > > > The way I see it, you simply need a regular service with > > > > ThreadLocalStorage. The servlet filter would set the visit in the > > > > ThreadLocalStorage for every request and the service > > would simply get > > > > and set the data on the visit in the ThreadLocal. Would that work? > > > > > > > > -Harish > > > > > > > > Geoff Longman wrote: > > > > > > > > >Perhaps, I wish I had more time to read the Hivemind source. > > > > > > > > > >I might be getting this wrong but how about a Factory > > that makes a > > > session > > > > >local instance of a service? Wait that can't be right. A > > > SessionLocalService > > > > >that pulls a service from a pool and hooks it up to the > > session. The > > > > >existing servlet filter could be a model for a filter > > that sets up the > > > > >SessionLocalService with the thread local session. > > > > > > > > > >The above ignores the need to restore/save a service's > > session local > > > state > > > > >though. > > > > > > > > > >hmm, still thinking.. > > > > > > > > > >Geoff > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > > >From: "Harish Krishnaswamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >To: "Tapestry development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > > > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 9:54 PM > > > > >Subject: Re: [Hivemind] Tapestry/HttpSession service > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Ah, yes I did miss that part. Seems like you want a > > wrapper service to > > > > >>the HttpSession like the Visit? > > > > >> > > > > >>Geoff Longman wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>>I don't think ThreadLocalStorage is sufficient. > > Perhaps this is too > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >specific > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>to Tapestry and is a topic for Tapestry 3.1 discussion. > > > > >>> > > > > >>>It all boils down to a service that not only is thread > > local, but is > > > also > > > > >>>session local. > > > > >>> > > > > >>>Geoff > > > > >>>----- Original Message ----- > > > > >>>From: "Harish Krishnaswamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >>>To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >>>Cc: "Tapestry development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >>>Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 9:28 PM > > > > >>>Subject: Re: [Hivemind] Tapestry/HttpSession service > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>Have you looked into the ThreadLocalStorage? > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>-Harish > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>Geoff Longman wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>>The content of this message crosses boundaries so I'm cc'ing > > Tapestry > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>too. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>I have a real problem in a Tapestry application and > > I'm wondering > > if > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>another > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>'flavour' of Hivemind service approach would be applicable. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>We have a Tapestry app that has many hundreds of > > pages. Different > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >groups > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>of > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>pages need to share different sets of information. > > We have tried > > > using > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>the > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>Visit to share data and have also tried explicity > > passing things > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >between > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>pages but both methods are less than ideal.. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>The visit approach ends up being like a big > > hashtable. Explicity > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >passing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>data via method calls leads to coupling between pages. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>What would be nice is a service that is not only > > pooled, but is > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >peristent > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>in > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>the Tapestry way, i.e. the value of certain fields > > in the service > > are > > > > >>>>>private to one user session. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>An example implementation could be a Wizard that > > uses 5 pages to > > > build > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>new > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>customer record in a database. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>If the service I described was doable, each page > > could access a > > > > >>>>>NewCustomerWizard service, read data from it and set > > data in it. > > The > > > > >>>>>NewCustomerWizardService could minimally reply to > > questions like: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>- Can the wizard finish? > > > > >>>>>- What's the next page to show? > > > > >>>>>- What's the previous page to show? > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>Thus, the pages could interact individually with the > > service and > > not > > > be > > > > >>>>>coupled to one another. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>In fact, a menu component could interrogate the > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >NewCustomerWizardService > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>also to get the first page to show in order to start > > the Wizard. > > > Plus, > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>the > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>service could keep track of all the pages used so > > far and if the > > user > > > > >>>>>clicked 'Finish' or 'Cancel', the service could > > respond with the > > list > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>seen pages for cleanup purposes (forgetPage()). > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>Is this wishful thinking? > > > > >>>>>Cheers, > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>Geoff > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>Geoffrey Longman > > > > >>>>>Intelligent Works Inc. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>--------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------ > > > > >>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>---------------------------------------------------------- > > ----------- > > > > >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>----------------------------------------------------------- > > ---------- > > > > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>------------------------------------------------------------ > > --------- > > > > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >>For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
