Oliver Heger wrote on Tuesday, March 30, 2004 9:25 PM: >> Definately, but post 1.0. I think you will be able to remove a lot of >> code with a real generic solution. For 1.0 we will have to modify the >> Configuration interface at least in a way, we can solve the problem >> with HierarchicalConfiguration and Oliver had a solution for this >> (making Configuration hierarchical arware). >> >> Regards, >> Jörg >> >> > Unfortunately I won't have time prior to Thursday evening. > Can you tell > me which unit tests are failing? If it's only the test for > ConfigurationXMLDocument, I would suggest to drop this class > in the 1.0 > release and add it later again (I think it is unlikely that > this class > is already used; it was lost after the move from sandbox and nobody > noticed). Other tests should not fail because they still worked after > the SubConfiguration refactoring.
Yes. It is the same old story. > If we start thinking about more support for hierarchical > configurations (an approach I really welcome), I now don't want to > come up > with a quick > solution for the actual problem. It would be much better to > do it right > in the next release. Fine with me. I would be glad to get 1.0 out of the door and do the hierarchy refactoring/integration for 1.1 Regards, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
