Hi,

I'd guess not. In Codec 1.1 the (checked) DecoderException was thrown. XML-RPC 2.0 alpha (HEAD) depends on version 1.1 of codec with no known issues.

I'd be surprised if we updated to 1.2 this summer. Our stable branch (1.2) has no current or planned dependency on codec because we had our own Base64 implementation. I probably already mentioned that we only need Base64, so we might end up deciding against having a codec dependency. Not long ago the Maven team encountered the same situation and they decided to copy the Base64 source rather than to depend on codec. I'd prefer not to follow suit for a lot of the same reasons we decided to create a shared Base64 implementation in the first place (early 2002 in the sandbox). For various reasons xmlrpc doesn't move very quickly, especially by jakarta standards. So for the time being, we'll probably stick with codec 1.1.

Cheers,
--
Ryan Hoegg
ISIS Networks
http://www.isisnetworks.net/

Gary Gregory wrote:

Has this been resolved within "build_ws-xmlrpc_ws-xmlrpc"?

I do not see the compile error mentioned in the message below in the
page:



http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/ws-xmlrpc/ws-xmlrpc/gump_work/build_w
s-


xmlrpc_ws-xmlrpc.html



Thank you,
Gary




-----Original Message-----
From: Adam R. B. Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 09:44
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [codec] base64Codec.decode and DecoderException

Folks,

An interested compatibility issue has surfaced from this:




http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/ws-xmlrpc/ws-xmlrpc/gump_work/build_w
s-


xmlrpc_ws-xmlrpc.html

/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ws-
xmlrpc/src/java/org/apache/xmlrpc/Defaul
tTypeFactory.java:133: exception


org.apache.commons.codec.DecoderException


is never thrown in body of corresponding try statement
   [javac]         catch (DecoderException e) {
   [javac]         ^

This is the code:

public Object createBase64(String cdata)
   {
       try {
           return base64Codec.decode(cdata.getBytes());
       }
       catch (DecoderException e) {
           //TODO: consider throwing an exception here?
           return new byte[0];
       }
   }

Now since exceptions are not part of the signature of methods, there


is


probably no runtime issue here. If the exception is not going to be


thrown


that is the same as it not actually being thrown, I guess. Still,


there is


a
compile time problem and if one removes the catch they can't compile
against
older codec (assuming that was declared to throw it).

Can somebody provide the background information on this exception,


from


this
method, and when (releases) it might've been available and removed? If
this
exception is never to be thrown again (and better, if it isn't thrown


in


currently released code) then maybe we can just ask the ws-xmlrpc


folks to


update.

BTW: I don't think there is a way to turn off this compiler error, is
there?
Would that be appropriate, even if possible?

regards,

Adam
--
Experience the Unwired Enterprise:
http://www.sybase.com/unwiredenterprise
Try Sybase: http://www.try.sybase.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to