-0

I'm usually using stable downloaded jars. I guess most commons users are not subscribed to this list
and just happy with downloaded stable builds.


Best regards,
Mikhail Krivoshein

Tim O'Brien wrote:

We make releases both source and binary, but why not just start cutting one
release?  I can understand why a product like HTTPD would be distributed
without source, but the commons community consists of developers.

Can anyone think of any good reason to preserve the current release
structure.

My apologizes in advance if this starts an endless flame war.  I have a
knack for that.

-----
Tim O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to